I could not help but agree with this whole video. I guess the Philippines should rather be a parliament rather than a presidential republic. After all, I could now see that the video about the Aquino-Cojuangco clan has some truths on it.
[Side Note: It’s only those who despise the Martial Law who do not agree with the facts stated by PMP]
However, when it comes to PMP’s way of showing that the Cojuangco-Aquino clan is still the center topic, well, why can’t they shift from one clan to another!? Sukang-suka na kami sa Aquino-Cojuangco clan, eh. Maiba naman.
What I’m saying about the results of the elections (if you have Facebook and you live in the Philippines, you’ll see what’s going on), I really feel very disappointed and extremely frustrated at the same time.
Well, the only popular people who are more credible and more commendable would be no other than Grace Poe, Cynthia Villar and some people out there who at least have a track record of some achievements and blah blah blah.
But… Nancy Binay and the rest of those who still have a long way to go!?
Nope, I despise the “n*gga” not basically because she’s dark-skinned or what, anong kinalaman ng signature kulay niya sa pulitika!? Well, basically, she’s only a mere product of the political dynasty–no wonder mas konti ang bashers ni Bam Aquino (if you’re going to compare him to the n*gga, at least Bam, despite being a product of a political dynasty, is exposed to politics–Roxyisferox stated that he has leadership skills and experience).
FEISTY ATTITUDE > PA-DIVA ATTITUDE
It should also be taken note that not all feisty or palaban women are palengkera, walang breeding, et cetera.
It’s like a mere comparison between the n*gga and Risa Hontiveros. Don’t gemme started on Risa. Sure, she has this certain face value that we cannot deny, but beyond that, she’s someone worth to be on a coveted position–and to other people who deserve the position better than the popular ones.
Now why the EFF should we vote for popularity alone?
At least, if I were to be asked, I’d rather choose Grace Poe since she has been an MTRCB chairperson.
Well, now I could see the good side with being palaban ever since Katrina Halili (seems irrelevant . If you’re talking about Annabelle Rama, sure, she’s very feisty and very thick-faced, but mind you that she didn’t win the elections. Overall, she should lower her pride.
Well, ego-istic naman talaga kasi si Bisaya, eh. No wonder, people would love bitching around her.
But it’s a good thing that Tita Bisaya is more than willing to be happy for her opponent. Well, they may rant that Cebuanos are wiser than Manilenyos, but the reason why they chose the opponent is because–Bisaya does not know anything about legislation. Kung tutuusin, she’s too old to run for a position.
People choose the person who is not even deserving to win at the first place
One thing that I’d like to tell them: (Salutes middle finger) P*+@ng !n@ n’yong lahat!
Remember that we should serve as a role model towards them–that we choose people who are not even that overhyped at the first place.
Side Note: One thing that I hate about these people is that, they only care about their stomachs (you have to bribe the masa as a politician and meet their needs rather than doing your over-all techniques/methods–you hafta be a traditionalist, in short). Sure, Georgina Wilson ranted against the people of Manila who voted for Erap, but she’s really slamming their over-all beliefs. Granted, Erap may be tainted in terms of reputation, but you’ll never deny that he is pro-masa–kaya buti na lang sinita ni Jake Ejercito, eh.
Vice Ganda here has substance. Sure, he hinted the “n*gga” for not following Junjun Binay’s footsteps first or let’s say… she has a long way to go–however, Vice majored in PolSci. So far, at least may nasabi siya despite being an insult comedian.
Overall, it’s Vice who is wiser than Georgi Fiveheads.
But it’s not about the stomachs that you should therefore target. It should be how they view mass media as a whole. As a matter of fact, lack of access towards education should no longer be an excuse to vote wisely. It should be vigilance that should be met.
I hate to brag, but I’m more vigilant than the rest of those I really know who has a “popular kid” mentality.
Side Note: See? Kung sino pa nga ang hindi deserving maging class/block president sa school, sila pa ang binoboto natin. Overall, political maturity starts in a classroom. I even cringed when our block leader was no other than the one who has this “bully” attitude (to think na gaijin siya). Eh siya nga, hindi nga niya matiis ‘yung pinaka-legendary na professor na kinatatakutan (kuno) ng inner circle namin, eh. (HAHAHAHA, allow me to talk frankly this time)
After all, I am more vigilant, and I could identify who deserves that position. At the first place, that person does not even deserve to be our leader. Frankly speaking, siya pa ang bully sa akin… eh.
Kita niyo? Kung mataas pala ang pride niya, why can’t that person just err… endure that “professor”? That professor really tests on how you bind other people–in short, it tests your sense of leadership.
Hahaha, ‘kala lang nila that I’m nobody to them? Personally, if I were to be asked, a leader should not be a bully and an initiator of all mischief. Well, after all, I’m smarter than them (bad joke, my bad LOL).
So these people after all allow themselves to be deprived of their basic needs!? TENGENE! They think that their stomachs and the mass media rule their life if there is actually more to that. In fact, the system is not the only thing to blame–it should be lack of vigilance that should be blamed.
Now I could come up with a synthesis that: These majority of the voters are similar to the judges who choose beauty over beauty and brains in a beauty pageant.
Bribery is similar to casting couch.
Don’t allow a bully to deprive you from your basic needs
One advice to the masa and to those who possess popular kid in high school mentality. After all, it is the popular kids in college who are better off than the HS popular kids (who happens to be “nobodies” in the social circle).
This is the question that one should answer… “Why do good leaders have haters?”
Courtesy of Famador Pierre (Photobucket)
Despite having numerous cases and scandals, former PGMA who is now CGMA is doing anything to fulfill Charter Change. Everyone is against Cha-Cha is because… the parliament system won’t be applicable to the Philippines, based upon history… particularly the Martial Law era. GMA is actually not a bad president as all, as she proposed and enact Holiday Economics to please people… yes, that means you have to move holidays, even the most important ones so that people won’t go to work after Sunday. It is hard to explain but somehow, PGMA prioritizes the interests of students, also with those who go to work.
PGMA’s only bad side is… all her promises, or most of her promises that will do good for the country… were not fulfilled. Most people are criticizing her is because she’s got this fortitude to those bad politicians who are her friends… which I consider it as nepotism.
Charter Change, Holiday Economics… yes, PGMA may have been the most despised leader, but her good side will always stay, as she is far more respected than P-Noy in terms of political actions when it comes to disasters and important meetings, like she doesn’t use her personal preference to benefit everyone.
Courtesy of assetrecovery.org
He may been the most abusive leader in the history of the Philippines, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that he’s a bad man. His rules regarding discipline and well-being is equivalent to how Singapore imposes their laws. If Ferdinand Marcos didn’t have any critic, he might have made the Philippines into a Tiger Economy, but all his stains in his image has flawed him… and the Filipinos during that time are starting to talk behind his back. His regime may have changed Philippine society since life during that time is good, but there are a lot of curfews. If I were to criticize him, certainly, I would praise him for his efforts just to make the Philippines a tiger economy. As for the issue of burying his corpse in the Libingan ng mga Bayani (The Heroes’ Graveyard), I think everyone should be contented that his body should be preserved since it is a tradition to preserve the body of a dictator, just like in the case of Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Minh, Joseph Stalin and Kim Il Sung, who were dictators during their regime. That is their cult of personality which made their bodies preserved, rather than buried. Although Ho Chi Minh wanted to be cremated, the officials didn’t fulfill his wish.
George W. Bush
Courtesy of newsomart.com
I still don’t get it why everyone hates him. Maybe because he’s a racist, or maybe because he’s really a leader who is actually… a republican. He may belong to the Bush political dynasty, but in the USA, it is ideal for a president to have a complete family, and that includes his wife and kids. Because if you don’t have this “requirement,” you will not be voted. The Americans believed that a single, childless candidate without a family cannot raise a nation. In Europe, having a wife (or a lifetime partner) is a status symbol.
I think most Americans didn’t like him is because he seemed arrogant, but when Obama succeeded him, everyone started to realize that George W. Bush has a good side, too. I’m not saying that Barack Obama is a bad leader, it’s just that there are many better leaders than him, or maybe because he is not as feisty as Bush.
So, why are they hated?
These examples of leaders are hated not because of their unusual style of leadership. Truth is, good leaders become abusive once they stayed long for the term as presidents. Most people call them conservatives, due to the mentality like, “We did nothing wrong,” or “We’re just doing our thing, so what’s wrong with it?” Well, most liberal leaders that we know today… aren’t actually as good as we thought. How could they “change” society if they haven’t proven something yet? It’s the people who are tempted, or probably influenced by their good-natured character. Good leaders are actually the ones who are feisty and are true fighters.
Political Dynasties do not matter, as long as they comply with the requirements
Following the family-oriented standard is really an indicator of responsibility. Well, if you just use your HEAD, rather than your interest, this is the thing: Take note of the Duterte political dynasty, they are fierce and feisty, and they deserve to be recognized as a good example, same with those who belong to the Kennedys. I’m quite sure that most of these dynasties who deserve good credit should be given a chance.